[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [uoml-x-comment] Defects in PDF Version of UOML-1-v1.0
Hello Pine Zhang, 1. OpenOffice.org 2.4.x versions produce ODF 1.1. That is correct. The file that you attached is in acceptable ODF 1.1 format. Do not be concerned. The OpenOffice.org 2.4.x builds do not appear to identify minor version in the <meta:generator> element. The build numbers between the -en and the zh-CN version may also differ. The conversion through the OpenOffice.org 2.4 version you have appears to be successful. 2. EXCELLENT! I confirm that the file that you made with OO.o has a Table of Contents with no Duplicates. The PDF that you attached also appears to be correct. 3. Review 3.1 The new table of contents also has the correct page numbers. Fortunately, the pagination of the document apart from the table of contents appears to be unchanged. 3.2 There is a font difference in the table of contents. I am not certain that this is in the necessary OASIS template style. I would not worry about that now. It is accurate and usable. 3.3 I cannot speak for Mary. It seems to me that the next steps are to review the content between the original ones that have been posted and the new one to make sure there are no differences apart from replacement of the table of contents. Then Mary can decide how to replace the documents for review and how to make it known that there is a better copy available. I will provide any assistance that I can to have that go well. Thank you for repairing the documents. - Dennis PS: The uoml-x-comment list filters out .pdf files. I have attached your new PDF here inside a .zip container. I have also included the .odt inside of a .zip container so that the list archive will retain it with the correct file type extension. -----Original Message----- From: Pine Zhang [mailto:pine_zhang@sursen.com] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/uoml-x-comment/200809/msg00007.html Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2008 03:29 To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org Cc: UOML-X Comment; Mary McRae; allison shi Subject: Re: [uoml-x-comment] Defects in PDF Version of UOML-1-v1.0 Dear Dennis, Thank you very much for your comments. 1. OpenOffice.org 2.4.1 version issue: I have downloaded the Openoffice.org 2.4.1 from http://zh.openoffice.org/new/zh_cn/downloads.html <http://zh.openoffice.org/new/zh_cn/downloads.html> , named " OOo_2.4.1rc2_20080529_Win32Intel_install_zh-CN.exe" . Opened the UOML specification and then saved the file again; After I unzip the odt document, find out the mata.xml, it describes :" xmlns:ooo="http://openoffice.org/2004/office" office:version="1.1"> <office:meta> <meta:generator>OpenOffice.org/2.4$Win32 OpenOffice.org_project/680m17$Build-9310</meta:generator> " I got confused about this as well. Please let me know how to create an odt file by Openoffice.org2.4.1 which can be identified as ODF 2.4.1. 2. Table of Content problems: I have eliminated the duplicate by configuration of "Index edit" in the OpenOffice . There are .ODT, .PDF and .htm files of UOML CS generated, please have a check the attachment. [ ... ]
uoml-part1-v1.0-cs01-odf1.1-pdf.zip
uoml-part1-v1.0-cs01-odf1.1-odt.zip
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]