[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] used ring: define the meaning and requirements of the len field.
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > So, if you think we should include this in 1.0 cs03, then you > need to vote no on the cs03 ballot, and we'll > redo a draft with these changes applied. On balance, I think that is necessary. I hate to think of an implementation getting this wrong. I encourage others to change their votes to No too. Thanks, Rusty.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]