OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

virtio-comment message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH] virtio-net: define feature of per-packet RSS hash delivery


On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 07:41:59PM +0200, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 6:35 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 12:20:01AM -0500, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ
> > >
> > >     From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
> > >     To: "Yuri Benditovich" <yuri.benditovich@daynix.com>
> > >     Cc: virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
> > >     Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2019 10:25:30 PM
> > >     Subject: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH] virtio-net: define feature of
> > >     per-packet RSS hash delivery
> > >
> > >     On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 08:32:12PM +0200, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
> > >     > Fixes: https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/66
> > >     > Conditional extending of virtio header structure to deliver
> > >     > packet's hash and hash type used for calculation.
> > >     >
> > >     > Signed-off-by: Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@daynix.com>
> > >
> > >     Functionally this looks mostly good. But we need to change the
> > >     way it's documented slightly.
> > >
> > > Probably, because the RSS patch is not merged yet.
> > >
> > >
> > >     > ---
> > >     >  content.tex | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >     >  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> > >     >
> > >     > diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> > >     > index 01be7df..44975e4 100644
> > >     > --- a/content.tex
> > >     > +++ b/content.tex
> > >     > @@ -2811,6 +2811,9 @@ \subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types /
> > >     Network Device / Feature bits
> > >     >  \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR(23)] Set MAC address through control
> > >     >      channel.
> > >     >
> > >     > +\item[VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT(58)] Device can report per-packet hash
> > >     value
> > >     > +    and a type of calculated hash
> > >     > +
> > >     >  \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS(60)] Device supports RSS (receive-side scaling)
> > >     >      with Toeplitz hash calculation and configurable hash parameters for
> > >     receive steering
> > >     >
> > >     > @@ -2844,6 +2847,8 @@ \subsubsection{Feature bit requirements}\label
> > >     {sec:Device Types / Network Device
> > >     >  \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR] Requires VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ.
> > >     >  \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_RSC_EXT] Requires VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO4 or
> > >     VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO6.
> > >     >  \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS] Requires VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ.
> > >     > +\item[VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT] Requires VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS.
> > >     > +
> > >     >  \end{description}
> > >     >
> > >     >  \subsubsection{Legacy Interface: Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types /
> > >     Network Device / Feature bits / Legacy Interface: Feature bits}
> > >     > @@ -3071,6 +3076,8 @@ \subsection{Device Operation}\label{sec:Device
> > >     Types / Network Device / Device O
> > >     >          le16 csum_start;
> > >     >          le16 csum_offset;
> > >     >          le16 num_buffers;
> > >     > +        le32 hash_value; (Only if VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT negotiated)
> > >     > +        le16 hash_type; (Only if VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT negotiated)
> > >     >  };
> > >     >  \end{lstlisting}
> > >     >
> > >     > @@ -3330,6 +3337,15 @@ \subsubsection{Processing of Incoming Packets}\
> > >     label{sec:Device Types / Network
> > >     >    set: if so, device has validated the packet checksum.
> > >     >    In case of multiple encapsulated protocols, one level of checksums
> > >     >    has been validated.
> > >     > +\item If VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT was negotiated and a device has
> > >     calculated
> > >     > +  a hash for the packet, \field{hash_value} contains calculated hash
> > >     value and
> > >     > +  \field{hash_type} contains exact hash type.
> > >     > +
> > >     > +  If the hash was not calculated, \field{hash_type} contains zero.
> > >     > +
> > >     > +  For defined hash types and their meaning, see \ref{sec:Device Types /
> > >     Network Device / Device configuration layout / RSS}.
> > >     > +
> > >     > +  For the procedure of hash calculation, see \ref{sec:Device Types /
> > >     Network Device / Device Operation / Control Virtqueue / Receive-side
> > >     scaling (RSS) / RSS hash types}.
> > >     >  \end{enumerate}
> > >     >
> > >     >  Additionally, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM, TSO4, TSO6, UDP and ECN
> > >     > @@ -3909,6 +3925,14 @@ \subsubsection{Control Virtqueue}\label{sec:Device
> > >     Types / Network Device / Devi
> > >     >  \item Else skip IPv6 extension headers and calculate the hash as defined
> > >     above for IPv6 packet without extension headers
> > >     >  \end{itemize}
> > >     >
> > >     > +If VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT was negotiated, the device reports
> > >     calculated hash information in fields of virtio_net_hdr as follows:
> > >     > +
> > >     > +Exact hash type is populated in \field{hash_type}
> > >     > +
> > >     > +Hash value is populated in \field{hash_value}
> > >     > +
> > >     > +If, due to any reason, the device did not calculate the hash, it sets \
> > >     field{hash_type} to zero.
> > >     > +
> > >     >  \drivernormative{\subparagraph}{Setting RSS parameters}{Device Types /
> > >     Network Device / Device Operation / Control Virtqueue / Receive-side
> > >     scaling (RSS) }
> > >     >
> > >     >  A driver MUST NOT send the VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_RSS_CONFIG command if the
> > >     feature VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS has not been negotiated.
> > >
> > >
> > >     This is understandably a minimal change, but imho messes things up:
> > >     hash calculation is no longer part of RSS so really should be moved
> > >     from out of there.
> > >
> > > Please advise why "hash calculation is no longer part of RSS".
> >
> > I might be misunderstanding things. It looks like with this
> > one can enable hash even with a single RX queue.
> > No?
> 
> Not exactly.
> Hash calculation (even with single queue, which is possible corner
> case) requires a key to be configured with
> VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_RSS_CONFIG command.
> So, if the device with one queue  is capable to deliver the hash it
> indicates VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS and VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT.
> I will add this.
> And probably the device should deny VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT without
> VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS.

Oh I see. Interesting. Do we want to tie the two features like this though?
I wonder why?
If yes we can certainly make VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT depend on RSS ...
If not there could be a variant of VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_RSS_CONFIG
without RSS tables that's allowed without RSS.

> >
> > >
> > >
> > >     So we'd have a chapter for hash calculation, defining hash types
> > >     etc.
> > >
> > > A chapter for hash calculation is in previous patch
> > > https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/201911/msg00014.html
> > >
> >
> > Can't see it there. Do you mean
> > +\subparagraph{RSS hash types}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Device Operation / Control Virtqueue / Receive-side scaling (RSS) / RSS hash types}
> > ?
> > Sure, what I am saying it needs to be moved from out of RSS then.
> >
> 
> I do not see how hash calculation can be moved out of RSS, it requires
> the configuration that comes with VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_RSS_CONFIG.

Allow VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_RSS_CONFIG with no RSS parameters
when RSS is off?

> > >
> > >     Then both RSS and the new chapter refer to that.
> > >
> > >     Also, I am guessing supported hash types should be valid
> > >     in config space with the new feature - isn't that right?
> > >
> > > Yes, of course.
> >
> > So we need to say this in the spec I think.
> 
> OK, I will add this.
> To avoid misunderstandings I think it is better to wait until the RSS
> patch (mentioned above) is merged.
> When approx. we can expect that?

Could of days, my laptop was in repair, so there's a backlog of
things to merge.

> >
> > > But this is not related to hash delivery.
> > > Packet hash is calculated according to allowed hash types.
> > > If hash delivery is negotiated, the device reports the calculated hash type
> > > which is, naturally, one of valid ones.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >     > --
> > >     > 2.17.2
> > >
> > >
> > >     This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
> > >     OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.
> > >
> > >     In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
> > >     to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
> > >     before posting.
> > >
> > >     Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> > >     Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> > >     List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> > >     List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
> > >     Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
> > >     List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/
> > >     mailing-lists
> > >     Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
> > >     Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]