OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

virtio-comment message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] virtio-net: introduce admin control virtqueue


On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:52:02 +0800
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:

> When implementing virtual devices like SR-IOV or sub-function. We're
> suffering from several issues:
> 
> - There's no management interface for management device to
>   configure features, attributes for a virtual device
> - Per virtual device control virtqueue could be very expensive as the
>   number of virtual devices could be very large
> - Virtualize per virtual device's control virtqueue could be very
>   challenge as we need the support of DMA isolation at queue level
> 
> So this patch introduces the feature of VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_ADMIN_VQ. This
> allows the device to implement a single admin control virtqueue to
> manage the features and attributes for a specific virtual device.
> 
> The idea is simple, a new virtual device id is introduced on top of
> the existing virtio_net_ctrl structure. This id is transport or device
> specific to uniquely identify a management or virtual device.
> 
> With this, we get a way of using management device (PF) to configure
> per virtual device features and attributes. And since the admin
> control virtqueue belongs to management device (PF), the DMA is
> naturally isolated at device level instead of the queue level for per
> virtual device control vq.
> 
> When the admin cvq is offered by management device and normal cvq is
> offered by virtual device. A new command class is introduced decide
> whether or not to accept commands from normal cvq for a virtual
> device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> ---
> Changes from V1:
> - use 'virtual device' instead of 'function'
> - introuce trust command
> - clairfy that the admin cvq could be used to configure management
>   device itself
> ---
>  content.tex | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> index 620c0e2..989b4f6 100644
> --- a/content.tex
> +++ b/content.tex
> @@ -2940,6 +2940,9 @@ \subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Feature bits
>  \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR(23)] Set MAC address through control
>      channel.
>  
> +\item[VIRTIO_NET_F_ADMIN_CTRL_VQ(56)] Admin control channel is
> +    available.
> +
>  \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT(57)] Device can report per-packet hash
>      value and a type of calculated hash.
>  
> @@ -3840,11 +3843,12 @@ \subsubsection{Processing of Incoming Packets}\label{sec:Device Types / Network
>  \subsubsection{Control Virtqueue}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Device Operation / Control Virtqueue}
>  
>  The driver uses the control virtqueue (if VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ is
> -negotiated) to send commands to manipulate various features of
> -the device which would not easily map into the configuration
> -space.
> +negotiated but VIRTIO_NET_F_ADMIN_CTRL_VQ is not negotiated) to send
> +commands to manipulate various features of the device which would not
> +easily map into the configuration space.
>  
>  All commands are of the following form:
> +is not negotiated:

Stray hunk.

>  
>  \begin{lstlisting}
>  struct virtio_net_ctrl {
> @@ -3864,6 +3868,29 @@ \subsubsection{Control Virtqueue}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Devi
>  do except issue a diagnostic if \field{ack} is not
>  VIRTIO_NET_OK.
>  
> +When both VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ and VIRTIO_NET_F_ADMIN_CTRL_VQ are
> +negotiated, the driver can use the admin control virtqueue of the
> +management device to manipulate features of individual virtual devices
> +where the control virtqueue is not easily implemented. The definition
> +of management device and virtual device is transport or device
> +specific. E.g in the case of PCI SR-IOV, the management device is
> +implemented via the physical function (PF), then the virtual device is
> +the virtual function (VF) in this case.

"...if the management device is implemented via the physical function
(PF), the virtual device is implemented via the virtual function (VF)."
?

> +
> +All commands are of the following form:
> +
> +\begin{lstlisting}
> +struct virtio_net_admin_ctrl {
> +        u32 virtual_device_id;
> +        struct virtio_net_ctrl ctrl;
> +};
> +\end{lstlisting}
> +
> +The \field{virtual_device_id} is an unique transport or device specific
> +identifier for a virtual device or management device. E.g for the case
> +of PCI SR-IOV, it's the PCI function id. Management device MUST

"...it is the PCI function id of the virtual function." ?

s/Management device/The management device/

> +reserve 0 for \field{virtual_device_id} to identify itself.

"reserve", or rather "use"?

That also implies that virtual_device_id must be != 0 for virtual
devices, doesn't it?

> +
>  \paragraph{Packet Receive Filtering}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Device Operation / Control Virtqueue / Packet Receive Filtering}
>  \label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Device Operation / Control Virtqueue / Setting Promiscuous Mode}%old label for latexdiff
>  
> @@ -4308,6 +4335,32 @@ \subsubsection{Control Virtqueue}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Devi
>  according to the native endian of the guest rather than
>  (necessarily when not using the legacy interface) little-endian.
>  
> +\paragraph{Setting Trust for Virtual Device}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Device Operation / Control Virtqueue / Setting Trust for Virtual Device}
> +
> +If the VIRTIO_NET_F_ADMIN_CTRL_VQ is negotiated, the management device
> +can accept operations via the control vq from the trusted virtual

"can accept the following operations" ?

(in addition to existing control commands?)

> +device.
> +
> +\begin{lstlisting}
> +#define VIRTIO_NET_ADMIN_CTRL_TRUST 0
> + #define VIRTIO_NET_ADMIN_CTRL_TRUST_ENABLE 0
> +\end{lstlisting}
> +
> +\devicenormative{\subparagraph}{Setting Trust for Virtual Device}{Device Types / Network Device / Device Operation / Control Virtqueue / Setting Trust for Virtual Device}
> +
> +If the VIRTIO_NET_F_ADMIN_CTRL_VQ has been negotiated, the device MUST

s/If the/If/

> +support VIRTIO_NET_ADMIN_CTRL_TRUST class

s/support/support the/

> +command. VIRTIO_NET_ADMIN_CTRL_TRUST_ENABLE turns trust for the
> +control virtqueue of a specific virtual device on and off. The command
> +specific data is one byte containing 0(off) or 1(on).  When trust is
> +off the device MUST fail any operations from the control virtqueue of
> +the virtual device. The management device MUST NOT trust any virtual
> +devices after reset.

A bit further up, it is stated that the management device can accept
operations from a "trusted virtual device". From this statement here, I
get that the trust state can be turned on and off by the virtual device.

Does the management device get to choose if it wants to trust a virtual
device, i.e. can it fail enabling the trust?

> +
> +\drivernormative{\subparagraph}{Setting Trust for Virtual Device}{Device Types / Network Device / Device Operation / Control Virtqueue / Setting Trust for Virtual Device}
> +
> +A driver SHOULD negotiate VIRTIO_NET_F_ADMIN_CTRL_VQ if the device
> +offers it.
>  
>  \subsubsection{Legacy Interface: Framing Requirements}\label{sec:Device
>  Types / Network Device / Legacy Interface: Framing Requirements}



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]