[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] virtio-vsock: SOCK_SEQPACKET description
On Thu, Jan 13 2022, Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 12:34:20PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>> Otherwise maybe we should write in the spec that if F_SEQPACKET is set >>> this means that stream is supported even if F_STREAM is not set. >> >>Yes, if that works, it would probably be the less ugly option. > > Okay, let's go for F_STREAM (even Michael's comment seems to agree with > that). > > Do you think we need to write this implication into the specification, > or do we leave it to the implementation to solve this transient problem? I would add something like "if F_SEQPACKET has been negotiated, the [device|driver] MUST act as if F_STREAM has also been negotiated".
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]