Re: [virtio-comment] RE: virtio-device in µC of a SoC

[Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>]

On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 07:53:23AM +0000, Gittinger Joerg (XC-ECO/ESH2 ETAS-VOS/XEO-ARA2) wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> > > Maybe making a concrete proposal is a better way to handle such a proposal.
> > > Please let me know if this is appropriate or not - just give me some 
> > > feedback, sort of either "Go away, we'll never support something like 
> > > this" or "Yes, this use case sounds valid. Let us refine/see how we could support this".
> >
> > Hi Joerg,
> > This is the right mailing list. Maybe the people who are interested in similar use cases are busy right now, but don't be discouraged!
> >
> > Your proposal sounds like it's within the scope of VIRTIO and makes sense in specific circumstances. The next step to making this more 
> > concrete is to send a specification patch (https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/) for review and voting.
> 
> Thanks a lot for the feedback. Then we'll elaborate a concrete specification change and feed it into the github virtio-spec project.

I will be mostly offline until August. Please continue without me.
VIRTIO 1.2 has just been published and hopefully more people in the
VIRTIO community will have time to participate in the discussion of new
feature proposals again.

Thanks,
Stefan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature