[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] virtio-net: Improve introductory description
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> > Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2023 4:46 AM [..] > > > General question: Is it better to talk about "the receive virtqueue" > > > (to keep it simple), or "a receive virtqueue" (as there may be several)? > > > > For sure Michael can better answer this than me. :) The receive > > virtqueue aligns to me with "the device", the driver etc. > > It also aligns with existing sections in device and driver requirements that > refers to "the receiveq". > > Since there are many queues, better to refer as "the". > > A receive queue may imply that there is only one. > > My take is that it should be "a queue" the first time we talk about it. Then if it's > the same queue we say "the queue". > I also feel an intro sentence saying something along the lines of "the device has > receive and transmit queues". Then rest of uses can be "the". Will update this in v3.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]