RE: [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] RE: [PATCH v6] virtio-net: Improve introductory description

[Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>]

> From: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org <virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org> On
> Behalf Of Cornelia Huck
> 
> On Thu, Feb 16 2023, Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com> wrote:
> 
> >> From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> >> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 11:03 AM
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 16 2023, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 02:30:03PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> >> >> > Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 9:10 AM
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Tue, Feb 14 2023, Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > The control VQ of the virtio network device is used beyond
> >> >> > > advance steering control. The control VQ dynamically changes
> >> >> > > multiple features of the initialized device.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Hence, update this area of control VQ introductory description
> >> >> > > at few places and also place the link to its description.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Also update the introduction section to better describe
> >> >> > > receive and transmit virtqueues.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Fixes: https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/156
> >> >> > > Reviewed-by: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>
> >> >> > > Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Are you requesting a vote for this?
> >> >>
> >> >> I was not sure if its need voting as most are editorial cleanups,
> >> >> better
> >> description, structure movement.
> >> >> Please advise if we need voting.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The bylaws are here:
> >> > https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/blob/master/README.md
> >> > Minor cleanups, including editorial formatting changes, spelling
> >> > and typo fixes can be committed directly into git for approval as
> >> > part of the next specification approval ballot.
> >> >
> >> > This is way beyond that. And generally when in doubt vote.
> >>
> >> Agreed.
> >>
> >> (Btw: the github issue needs to be updated to point to the latest
> >> version of the patch, it still points to v1.)
> >
> > Done.
> 
> Do you request to withdraw the ballot, so that we can start a new ballot with
> the proper URL?
> 
> (Sorry about being a stickler for process here.)

Yes, can you please withdraw the ballot [1] as it contains stale reference to the patch?

[1] https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/virtio/ballot.php?id=3758

Also please create new ballot as the github link is now updated for the issue [2].
[2] https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/156