Re: [PATCH v5] virtio-net: Fix and update VIRTIO_NET_F_NOTF_COAL feature

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 12:36:32PM +0200, Alvaro Karsz wrote:
> > sounds good. maybe "counting packets and microseconds"? to make clear
> > timer resets too.
> >
> > > I don't really mind, If you think that the device implementation is
> > > not essential here and we should add your suggestion, I'm ok with
> > > that.
> >
> > I don't mind, your proposal seems good too.
> 
> Ok, so I'll add:
> "... whichever happens first.
> After  the notification conditions are met,

maybe just "afterwards" for brevity and to stress it is after sending interrupt
so it does not affect the interrupt only the next one.

> the device waits for the
> next packet and starts counting  packets and microseconds again."
> 
> Thanks!