RE: [PATCH v1 2/2] transport-pci: Move transitional device id to legacy section

[Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>]

> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2023 6:00 PM
> 
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 12:06:36AM +0200, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > Currently PCI device requirements section contains mix of normative
> > statements for for regular (non transitional) device and transitional
> > device under one section.
> >
> > Some requirements of the transitional device are also located in
> > legacy interface section which is the right section for it.
> >
> > Hence,
> > 1. Move transitional device requirements to their designated Legacy
> >    interface section
> > 2. Describe regular device requirements without quoting it as "non
> >    transitional device"
> >
> > While at it, write the description using a singular object definition.
> >
> > This is only an editorial change.
> >
> > This patch is on top of [1].
> >
> > [1]
> > https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/202302/msg00578.html
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
> 
> nack I already answered this. legacy sections describe legacy interface of
> transitional devices.
> 
Legacy device id of the transitional device is 0x1000 for net. 
Legacy revision id of the transitional device is 0x0.
Why revision id belongs to legacy section, but device id doesn't?
Still trying to understand this convoluted policy.
Will re-read your email again if that is explained somehow without bringing the driver in context.