Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH v10] virtio-net: support the virtqueue coalescing moderation

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 04:42:25PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> 
> > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Monday, March 6, 2023 5:57 PM
> > 
> > On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 11:36:18AM +0000, David Edmondson wrote:
> > > > +                                        for an enabled transmit/receive virtqueue whose
> > number is \field{vqn}.
> > >
> > > Should this now be "whose index is \field{vqn}"?
> > 
> > Ugh.  I guess we'll have to fix the number/index mess in the spec first. Parav
> > you said you are looking into it?
> 
> Yes, I want to send v1 for " Rename queue index to queue number" series.
> V1 will include,
>  
> a. the vqn changes for net device rss and 
> b. other ccw changes that Cornelia requested.
> c. extra note that you asked to add to mmio for referring the old naming convention
> 
> I guess we agree that it should be vqn.
> Therefore, vq coalescing and aq series should progress with vqn terminology.
> This way all 3 series can progress in parallel (aq, vq coalescing, current spec cleanup).

Don't much care at this point but I think when I thought about this
deeply it seemed that yes, it is marginally better. Don't remember why
though ;)

-- 
MST