RE: [PATCH v3 6/8] transport-ccw: Refer to the vq by its number

[Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>]

> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2023 6:22 PM

> > +\begin{note}
> > +\field{queue_select} was previously named as index.
> 
> sounds a bit strange, and \field{} is missing. If you insist I'd say
> 	in previous versions of this specification,
> 	field{queue_select} was also called queue \field{index}
> 
The field is missing because field index is no longer there.
> 
> e.g. in blk we have this:
>   In the legacy interface, VIRTIO_BLK_F_FLUSH was also
>   called VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE.
> 
> 
> but I really feel this misses the point, the compat is needed
> in the struct definition, not split out after usage
> is described. This is why I proposed just making this a comment in the
> struct. Why not?
> 
Sure comment is good to me too.
In v0 you specifically asked to add note with example.
You said "like "Note: this was previously known as QueueNumMax""
It is hard to guess to write a comment when you mean "Note". :)

I will change to comment format.