Re: [PATCH 00/11] Introduce transitional mmr pci device

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 01:35:01PM -0400, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > So something like a vq would be a step up. I would like to
> > understand the performance angle though. What you describe
> > is pretty bad.
> > 
> Do you mean latency is bad or the description?

I don't know. We need admin vq and transport vq to work.
You describe latency numbers that make both unworkable.
I am interested in fixing that somehow, since it's a blocker.

-- 
MST