Re: [virtio-comment] RE: [PATCH v12 03/10] content: Rename confusing queue_notify_data and vqn names

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 01:21:40PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> 
> 
> > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2023 1:30 AM
> 
> 
> > VIRTIO_F_NOTIF_CONFIG_DATA is such a narrow usecase, I don't like burning
> > "vq identifier" on this. How about we just say something along the lines of:
> > 
> Ok. 
> > 
> > When VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has not been negotiated, this
> > notification involves sending either the virtqueue index or the virtqueue config
> > data to the device (method depending on the transport).
> > 
> > And then "the data sent is a device supplied virtqueue config data".
> > 
> Sounds fine. I will reword it.

FWIW I like this more than coming up with a cookie term, it is definitely a
more conservative approach.

-- 
MST