Re: [PATCH 08/11] transport-pci: Introduce virtio extended capability

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:21:56PM -0400, Parav Pandit wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/4/2023 10:37 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 03:19:53PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > > > > What does it "Co-developed-by" mean exactly that Signed-off-by
> > > > > > does not?
> > > > > 
> > > > > AIUI, "Co-developed-by:" is more akin to a second "Author:", i.e. to
> > > > > give attribution. (Linux kernel rules actually state that any
> > > > > "Co-developed-by:" must be followed by a "Signed-off-by:" for that
> > > > > author, but we don't really do DCO here, the S-o-b is more of a
> > > > > convention.)
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Actually, we might want to generally, to signify agreement to the IPR.
> > > > How about adding this to our rules?  But in this case Satananda Burla is
> > > > a TC member so yes, no problem.
> > > 
> > > Adding a s-o-b requirement is not a bad idea... do you want to propose
> > > an update?
> > 
> > OK how about the following:
> > 
> > ---------------
> > The process for forwarding comments from others:
> > 
> > Generally, subscribing to the virtio comments mailing list
> > requires agreement to the OASIS feedback license, at
> > https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
> > 
> It is not straight forward for non virtio tc member to realize above
> obligation.
> It is worth to document it in the section [1].
> 
> [1]
> https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=virtio#feedback
> 
> Something like,
> 
> From:
> If you're interested in following ongoing development and can't join the
> committee, I recommend you subscribe to the virtio-comment and virtio-dev
> lists.
> 
> To:
> If you're interested in following ongoing development and can't join the
> committee, I recommend you subscribe to the virtio-comment and virtio-dev
> lists. Your contribution to above mailing lists is licensed under the OASIS
> feedback license agreement describe at [1].

yes. unfortunately oasis does not let us tweak this section.


> > When forwarding (in modified or unmodified form) comments from others, please
> > make sure the commenter has read and agreed to the
> > feedback license. If this is the case, please include the following:
> > 
> > License-consent: commenter's name <commenter's email>
> > 
> > where commenter's name <commenter's email> is a valid
> > name-addr as specified in RFC 5322, see
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5322#section-3.4
> > 
> > If the comment is on behalf of an organization, please use the
> > organization's email address.
> > 
> > 
> > If forwarding a comment from a TC member, please instead get consent to
> > the full Virtio TC IPR, and then, as before, include
> > 
> > License-consent: commenter's name <commenter's email>
> > 
> License-consent tag do not capture the contribution by other virtio tc
> member(s) in the generated comment.
> 
> Signed-off-by captures it.
> So both tags are needed depending on comment contribution type.

Attribution is nice but Signed-off-by is not that.
And fundamentally people go read the PDF where the Signed-off-by
does not appear at all no one pokes at git history.
Let's just do:

Thanks-to: name <email>

if you want attribution.

will be helpful to fill in the thanks section in the spec
and does not mention signatures.



> Rest above change looks good to me.
> 
> > If you are reusing a comment that has already been posted to the
> > TC mailing list, the above tags are not required.
> > 
> > ---------------
> > 
> > We could reuse Signed-off-by though I am a bit concerned whether
> > people will assume it's a DCO thing which everyone copies.
> > Thoughts?