Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH 09/11] transport-pci: Describe PCI MMR dev config registers

[Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 4:29âAM Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
>
> > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2023 4:27 PM
> > On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 05:23:30PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > > > Things might be simplified if we use separate queues for admin,
> > > > transport and legacy.
> > > >
> > > Do you mean say we have three AQs, AQ_1, AQ_2, and AQ_3;
> > > AQ_1 of the PF used by admin work as SIOV device create, SRIOV MSIX
> > configuration.
> > > AQ_2 of the PF used for transporting legacy config access of the PCI
> > > VF
> > > AQ_3 of the PF for some transport work.
> > >
> > > If yes, sounds find to me.
> >
> > Latest proposal simply leaves the split between AQs up to the driver.
> > Seems the most flexible.
> Yes. It is. Different opcode range and multiple AQs enable to do so.

Right, so it would be some facility that makes the transport commands
of modern and legacy are mutually exclusive.

Thanks

>
> This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
> OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.
>
> In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
> to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
> before posting.
>
> Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
> Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
> List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
> Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
> Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/
>