[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 08/11] transport-ccw: Refer to the vq by its index
On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 22:23:38 +0300 Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com> wrote: > Currently specification uses virtqueue index and > number interchangeably to refer to the virtqueue. > > Instead refer to it by its index. > > Fixes: https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/163 > Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> > --- > changelog: > v11->v12: > - removed changes related to index > - replace number with index > - added 'only' to make it more clear that > notification has only vq index > v9->v10: > - replaced queue_select with vqn > - used lower case letter for first word in comment > v8->v9: > - replaced 'named' with 'known' > - replaced 'queue number' with 'vq number' > v3->v4: > - moved note to comment > v2->v3: > - added comment note for queue_select similar to max_queue_size > v0->v1: > - new patch > --- > transport-ccw.tex | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/transport-ccw.tex b/transport-ccw.tex > index cb476c7..86272d1 100644 > --- a/transport-ccw.tex > +++ b/transport-ccw.tex > @@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ \subsubsection{Guest->Host Notification}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Vi > \end{tabular} > > When VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has not been negotiated, > -the \field{Notification data} contains the Virtqueue number. > +the \field{Notification data} contains the virtqueue index. > > When VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has been negotiated, > the value has the following format:
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]