Re: [PATCH 0/2] admin virtqueue fixes

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 11:34:10AM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> 
> 
> > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2023 3:42 AM
> > 
> > On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 01:44:28AM +0300, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Michael,
> > >
> > > Please review these two small fixes for the admin virtqueue patches.
> > > They are on top of your work of v12 at [1].
> > >
> > > Patch summary:
> > > patch-1 removes PCI transport dependency on deprecated migration bit
> > > patch-2 fixes admin command command data type to be u8 similar to
> > > result
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/virtio-comment/cover.1682354275.git.mst@redhat
> > > .com/T/#t
> > 
> > I can take 1/2 since that's just removing text. Taking 2/2 will mean more review
> > time before vote - besides me not really liking that change, are you sure it's
> > worth it?
> > Was going to start voting today but if we are still tweaking command format
> > then I can't ...
> >
> There were 4 editorial fixes without which PDF is not readable for v12 and commit message needs update the AQ usage.
> It needs rebase also.
> And these two changes also.
> 
> Given we have 6+ changes, better to make them and ask for vote after that.
> 
> Vote includes spec and commit message content.
> So please roll v13 addressing above to make things easier to vote.
> 
> You said posting too fast is not good. Now one week has passed, so its fine to repost v13 and ask for the vote.

Yes absolutely. I am still debating with myself whether
the change in result from u8 to le64 means I should wait another
week before vote ...