Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] transport-pci: Introduce legacy registers access using AQ

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 08:47:04PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 9:39 AM
> > 
> > On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 01:28:40PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > > This is not the objective to transport all PCI virtio fields over AQ.
> > > Transport VQ commands proposal commands and commands in this proposal
> > are just fine the way there without quoting it as "transport".
> > 
> > I mean, it's a transport in a sense of where it will reside in e.g.
> > linux virtio stack - below virtio core.
> > We don't save much code there by reusing the same register layout of legacy
> > pci.
> > But let's at least make this feature complete, and then we'll see whether it is
> > cleaner to reuse legacy layout or build a new one.
> 
> I don't follow your comment about "this feature complete".
> When you say _this_, it means the feature proposed in this patch of supporting legacy over PCI VFs?
> 
> If so, anything missing in this proposal?

I think I commented at least on what I see as missing is first of all
a need to support INT#x emulation since level interrupts are I think
not supported for VFs. right?