[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] transport-pci: Introduce group legacy group member config region access
> From: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org <virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org> On > Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > Sent: Monday, June 19, 2023 1:04 PM > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 08:30:15PM +0300, Parav Pandit wrote: > > +Even though virtqueue driver notifications can be communicated > > +through administration virtqueue, if the group member device support > > +such notifications using a memory-mapped operation, such driver > > +notifications are sent using a group member device defined notification > region. > > I still feel we should support sending notifications to owner at least optionally. > For example: > Let's not please keep discussing this yet again. I won't be able to. We have captured this alternative already in the cover letter in the alternatives section. This optional capability can be added when there is a _real_ implementation by some hw. > > \begin{lstlisting} > struct virtio_pci_owner_legacy_notify_cap { > struct virtio_pci_cap cap; > le32 notify_off_multiplier; /* Multiplier for member id. */ }; \end{lstlisting} > > \field{notify_off_multiplier} is combined with the \field{member id} to derive > an address within a BAR. > > \begin{lstlisting} > cap.offset + member_id * notify_off_multiplier \end{lstlisting} > > > > We also need, as part of theory of operation, text that reads something like > "accessing the member device legacy interface using one of XYZ commands has > the same effect as accessing it using the legacy interface". > Ack. I will add this. > > > Also, do all VFs support legacy interface with these commands or none at all? > Right. > > Also these devices will use non-transitional ID but they in fact do have a legacy > interface so using this definition they are transitional devices. Maybe we need > to add when we describe the device ID text like "non transitional devices and > transitional devices utilizing commands XYZ" ...? Transitional device has specific meaning, I am not sure we should muddy it.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]