[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [PATCH v10 4/4] transport-pci: Introduce group legacy group member config region access
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> > Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2023 12:39 PM > > > +The group owner device or the group member device or both MAY > > > +support driver notifications region. > > > > Make this "a driver notification region"? > > I think in fact for conformance we can just refer to supporting the command. > The command can return an array of structures, each referring to the memory > of the owner device or the member device. > Array and referring to owner/member is already present in this patch. Do you suggest to drop above statement? > > > > + > > > +For the SR-IOV group type, the owner device supporting > > > +VIRTIO_ADMIN_CMD_LEGACY_COMMON_CFG_READ, > > > +VIRTIO_ADMIN_CMD_LEGACY_COMMON_CFG_WRITE, > > > +VIRTIO_ADMIN_CMD_LEGACY_DEV_CFG_READ, > > > +VIRTIO_ADMIN_CMD_LEGACY_DEV_CFG_WRITE and > > > +VIRTIO_ADMIN_CMD_LEGACY_NOTIFY_QUERY > > > +commands and its member device SHOULD follow the rules for the PCI > > > +Device ID, > > what does "its" mean here? Of the group? Yes, will change to the member device of the group. > Members of the SR-IOV group type are VFs. They can not follow the rules for > the Device ID: the spec says: > This field in all VFs returns FFFFh when read. > > Even if you somehow refer to the software it's extraneous anyway since the > spec proceeds: VI software should return the Vendor ID value from the > associated PF as the Vendor ID value for the VF. > > We'll need a separate statement for Device ID. > Will split the line for Device ID. > > > +Revision ID and Subsystem Device ID of the non-transitional devices > > > +documented in section \ref{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI > Bus / PCI Device Discovery}.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]