OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

virtio-comment message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH RFC 3/3] rng: leak detection support


On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 12:16:22PM +0200, Babis Chalios wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> 
> On 21/11/22 17:30, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Add virtqueues to support reporting entropy leaks (similar to virtio based vmgenid).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >   virtio-rng.tex | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >   1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/virtio-rng.tex b/virtio-rng.tex
> > index 1ec7164..4760dfa 100644
> > --- a/virtio-rng.tex
> > +++ b/virtio-rng.tex
> > @@ -9,10 +9,14 @@ \subsection{Device ID}\label{sec:Device Types / Entropy Device / Device ID}
> >   \subsection{Virtqueues}\label{sec:Device Types / Entropy Device / Virtqueues}
> >   \begin{description}
> >   \item[0] requestq
> > +\item[1] leakq1 (only if VIRTIO_RNG_F_LEAK is offered)
> > +\item[2] leakq2 (only if VIRTIO_RNG_F_LEAK is offered)
> >   \end{description}
> >   \subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / Entropy Device / Feature bits}
> > -  None currently defined
> > +\begin{description}
> > +\item[VIRTIO_RNG_F_LEAK (0)] Device can report and handle information leaks.
> > +\end{description}
> >   \subsection{Device configuration layout}\label{sec:Device Types / Entropy Device / Device configuration layout}
> >     None currently defined.
> > @@ -21,6 +25,7 @@ \subsection{Device Initialization}\label{sec:Device Types / Entropy Device / Dev
> >   \begin{enumerate}
> >   \item The \field{requestq} virtqueue is initialized
> > +\item If VIRTIO_RNG_F_LEAK has been negotiated, \field{leakq1} and \field{leakq2} are initialized
> >   \end{enumerate}
> >   \subsection{Device Operation}\label{sec:Device Types / Entropy Device / Device Operation}
> > @@ -41,3 +46,57 @@ \subsection{Device Operation}\label{sec:Device Types / Entropy Device / Device O
> >   The device MUST place one or more random bytes into the buffer
> >   made available to it through \field{requestq}, but it
> >   MAY use less than the entire buffer length.
> > +
> > +\subsubsection{Reporting Information Leaks}{Device Types / Entropy Device / Device Operation / Reporting Information Leaks}
> > +
> > +The device might, after the fact, detect that some of the entropy
> > +it supplied to the driver has after the fact degraded in quality
> > +or leaked to the outside world.  One example is when the device
> > +is part of the virtual machine undergoing a restore from snapshot
> > +operation. Another example is when the information leaks from the
> > +host system through a side-channel.
> > +
> > +The driver would typically react by causing regeneration of any
> > +information that might have leaked and that has to be secret or
> > +unique.  It is understood that when an information leak has been
> > +detected it is likely not limited to the entropy received through
> > +the specific device. In particular, this is the case for
> > +snapshoting It is thus suggested that the system fully
> > +regenerate any unique/secret information in this scenario.
> > +
> > +If VIRTIO_RNG_F_LEAK has been negotiated the device can report
> > +such leaks to the driver through a set of dedicated leak
> > +queues: \field{leakq1} and \field{leakq2}.
> > +
> > +Buffers added to the leak queues can have one of two forms:
> > +\begin{enumerate}
> > +\item A write-only buffer. It will be completely filled by random data by the device.
> > +\item A buffer consisting of read-only section followed by a
> > +write-only section, both of identical size. The
> > +device will copy data from the read-only section to the write-only
> > +section.
> > +\end{enumerate}
> > +
> > +The steps for operating the virtqueue are:
> > +
> > +\begin{enumerate}
> > +\item At each time, only one of \field{leakq1}, \field{leakq2} is active
> > +      (has buffers added/used).
> > +\item After initialization, \field{leakq1} is active.
> > +\item Driver adds multiple buffers to the active leak queue.
> > +\item The buffers are not used until an information leak is
> > +      detected, as long as that is the case driver can
> > +      add more buffers to the active queue.
> > +\item Upon detecting an information leak, device starts
> > +      using buffers in the active leak queue.
> > +\item Upon detecting that buffers have been used, driver
> > +      switches to another leak queue making it active
> > +      (e.g. from \field{leakq1} to \field{leakq2} or vice versa).
> > +      It then starts adding buffers to the new leak queue.\
> 
> I have been discussing with Alex and we think there's a potential race here,
> between the time the driver
> sees the used buffers in the active leak queue until the time it adds new
> buffers to the next leak queue.
> If a new entropy leak event arrives the VMM won't find any buffers in the
> queue.

I do not understand why this matters though. we know there was a leak,
why does it matter whether there was one or two leaks?

> In the last RFC implementing this in Linux we sent to LKML [1] we avoid the
> issue by pre-populating both
> queues, but that does not solve the problem if a third entropy leak event
> arrives. The probability of this
> happening is indeed small, but we thought of a potential solution to this.
> 
> What if we modify the spec here to instruct the VMM to deny taking a
> snapshot if there are not any buffers
> in the active leak queue? If we did this, we could even simplify the spec to
> just introduce a single entropy
> leak queue, so we could avoid the complexity of switching between active
> leak queues in the driver and
> the device. WDYT?

here's the problem: 

- driver adds batch 1 of buffers
- leak
- device starts using buffers from batch 1
- driver sees some buffers and starts adding batch 2
- device sees batch 2 and thinks this is part of batch 1
  consumes them all




> Cheers,
> Babis
> 
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230823090107.65749-3-bchalios@amazon.es/T/
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]