virtio-comment message

Subject: RE: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH 2/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status

From: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
To: "Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 04:42:29 +0000

> From: virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org <virtio-comment@lists.oasis-
> open.org> On Behalf Of Zhu, Lingshan
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2023 8:27 AM


> a new feature bit: VIRTIO_F_RING_SUSPEND_RESET. If this feature bit has been
> negotiated then the device allow reset a vq after SUSPEND.

This is simply a wrong semantics to build to operate individual object after its parent object is suspended.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH 2/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status
  - From: "Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>

References:
- [PATCH 0/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit and vq state
  - From: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
- [PATCH 2/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status
  - From: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status
  - From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status
  - From: "Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status
  - From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status
  - From: "Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>