[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [VIRTIO PCI PATCH v5 1/1] transport-pci: Add freeze_mode to virtio_pci_common_cfg
Hi Lingshan, Please reply to your own email thread, below are not related to my patches. Thanks a lot. On 2023/9/20 15:47, Zhu, Lingshan wrote: > > > On 9/20/2023 3:35 PM, Parav Pandit wrote: >>> From: Zhu, Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com> >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 1:00 PM >>> >>> On 9/20/2023 3:24 PM, Chen, Jiqian wrote: >>>> Hi Lingshan, >>>> It seems you reply to the wrong email thread. They are not related to my >>> patch. >>> These reply to Parva's comments. >>> @Parva, if you want to discuss more about live migration, please reply in my >>> thread, lets don't flood here. >> You made the point that "this is not live migration". >> I am not discussing live migration in this thread. >> >> I replied for the point that device restoration from suspend for physical and hypevisor based device is not a 40nsec worth of work to restore by just doing a register write. >> This is not live or device migration. This is restoring the device context initiated by the driver owning the device. > restore the device context should be done by the hypervisor before setting DRIVER_OK and waking up the guest, not a concern here, out of spec > -- Best regards, Jiqian Chen.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]