Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH v1 1/8] admin: Add theory of operation for device migration

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 12:02:54PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> 
> > From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Monday, October 9, 2023 2:19 PM
> > 
> > Adding LingShan.
> > 
> > Parav, if you want any specific people to comment, please do cc them.
> > 
> > On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 7:26âPM Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > One or more passthrough PCI VF devices are ubiquitous for virtual
> > > machines usage using generic kernel framework such as vfio [1].
> > 
> > Mentioning a specific subsystem in a specific OS may mislead the user to think
> > it can only work in that setup. Let's not do that, virtio is not only used for Linux
> > and VFIO.
> This is just one example on how these commands are useful.
> It can be useful in more ways too in more OSes too.
> I will drop from the patch commit log and keep as information purpose in cover letter.
> Would that work for you?
> 
> I donât have any strong opinion to keep it or remove it as most stakeholders has the clear view of requirements now.
> Let me know.

So some people use VFs with VFIO. Hence the module name.  This sentence
by itself seems to have zero value for the spec. Just drop it.

-- 
MST