Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH v1 3/8] device-context: Define the device context fields for device migration

[Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>]

å 2023/10/26 11:50, Parav Pandit åé:
> > From: virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org <virtio-comment@lists.oasis-
> > open.org> On Behalf Of Jason Wang
> > For example, you still haven't succeeded in defining passthrough.
> It was defined on 19th Oct in [1].
> What part is not clear to you in definition of passthrough device?
>
> [1] PH0PR12MB5481EA6A4D0C64C5AF6D3A57DCD4A@PH0PR12MB5481.namprd12.prod.outlook.com/">https://lore.kernel.org/virtio-comment/PH0PR12MB5481EA6A4D0C64C5AF6D3A57DCD4A@PH0PR12MB5481.namprd12.prod.outlook.com/


Let me copy-paste it again:

For example, assuming you are correct, you still fail to explain

1) what is trapped and what's not, or what's the boundary
2) if the hypervisor is not developed with those assumptions, things
can work or not

Thanks


>