Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH v1 1/8] admin: Add theory of operation for device migration

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:07:53AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> How TDISP/attestation is related to a specific device driver? How can
> a legacy DPDK driver break things like attestation here?
> 
> > Hence it is not applicable.
> 
> Wow. The legacy tunnel was just invented by you for just several
> months and soon became a second-class citizen in the proposal here?

Legacy is not going to be a 1st class citizen and that was a
concious decision the TC made. In particular we know straight
away that there is no way to make them safely work
while preserving assumptions confidential computing
guests make (which I guess is what you mean here).
The whole point of isolating legacy mess in the special
commands was so we don't try to support them going forward,
don't try to add new features for legacy interfaces please.

-- 
MST