Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] virtio-net: update description for VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM.

[Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 4:08âPM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> To prevent readers from misunderstanding that the driver can
> only handles packets with partial checksum when
> VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM is negotiated, we update the description.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  device-types/net/description.tex | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/device-types/net/description.tex b/device-types/net/description.tex
> index aff5e08..529f470 100644
> --- a/device-types/net/description.tex
> +++ b/device-types/net/description.tex
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ \subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Feature bits
>  \begin{description}
>  \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM (0)] Device handles packets with partial checksum offload.
>
> -\item[VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM (1)] Driver handles packets with partial checksum.
> +\item[VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM (1)] Driver handles packets with partial checksum or full checksum.

So patch 2 said

"
+\item[VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_FULL_CSUM (64)] Driver handles packets with
full checksum.
 \end{description}
"

Is there any difference between the two "full checksum" here?

Thanks

>
>  \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS (2)] Control channel offloads
>          reconfiguration support.
> --
> 2.19.1.6.gb485710b
>