OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

virtio-comment message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] virtio-net: update description for VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM.




å 2023/12/1 äå2:24, Heng Qi åé:


å 2023/12/1 äå1:18, Jason Wang åé:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 4:23âPM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:


å 2023/11/29 äå4:00, Jason Wang åé:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 4:08âPM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
To prevent readers from misunderstanding that the driver can
only handles packets with partial checksum when
VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM is negotiated, we update the description.

Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
---
ÂÂ device-types/net/description.tex | 2 +-
ÂÂ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/device-types/net/description.tex b/device-types/net/description.tex
index aff5e08..529f470 100644
--- a/device-types/net/description.tex
+++ b/device-types/net/description.tex
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ \subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Feature bits
ÂÂ \begin{description}
ÂÂ \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM (0)] Device handles packets with partial checksum offload.

-\item[VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM (1)] Driver handles packets with partial checksum. +\item[VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM (1)] Driver handles packets with partial checksum or full checksum.
So patch 2 said

"
+\item[VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_FULL_CSUM (64)] Driver handles packets with
full checksum.
ÂÂ \end{description}
"

Is there any difference between the two "full checksum" here?
There's no difference.

The core is that VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_FULL_CSUM means that the driver "can
only" handle packets with full checksum.
This seems to be odd.

Driver can always handle packet with full checksum, no?

Yes.

I meant it
will be then to be functional equivalent to !
VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_FULL_CSUM?

Are you referring to
"functional equivalent to !VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM" ?

Sorry, this is a typo. I meant

Are you referring to
"functional equivalent to !VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_FULL_CSUM" ?

If so, I think it's no.

Maybe a description similar to the following would be more clearer:

+\item[VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_FULL_CSUM (64)] Driver does not handle packets with partial checksum.

Thanks!


Thanks

Thanks!

Thanks

\item[VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS (2)] Control channel offloads
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ reconfiguration support.
--
2.19.1.6.gb485710b



This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.

In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.

Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]