[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio] [PATCH] virtio-net: clarify error handling for coalescing
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 11:23:08AM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: > > > > From: virtio@lists.oasis-open.org <virtio@lists.oasis-open.org> On Behalf Of > > Michael S. Tsirkin > > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2024 4:46 PM > > To: virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org; virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org > > Cc: virtio@lists.oasis-open.org > > Can we please avoid posting to three different lists? Yea I'll stop. Used to do it because of different archiving rules. I'll stick to virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: [virtio] [PATCH] virtio-net: clarify error handling for coalescing > > > > This is not a huge deal since it's a SHOULD anyway, so make the new > > requirement SHOULD too. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> > > --- > > device-types/net/description.tex | 6 +++++- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/device-types/net/description.tex b/device- > > types/net/description.tex > > index aff5e08..d1d25fe 100644 > > --- a/device-types/net/description.tex > > +++ b/device-types/net/description.tex > > @@ -1792,7 +1792,11 @@ \subsubsection{Control > > Virtqueue}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Devi > > > > The device MUST ignore \field{reserved}. > > > > -The device SHOULD respond to VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_TX_SET and > > VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_RX_SET commands with VIRTIO_NET_ERR if > > it was not able to change the parameters. > > +The device SHOULD respond to VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_TX_SET and > > +VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_RX_SET commands with VIRTIO_NET_ERR > > if it was > > +not able to change coalescing parameters. In this case, the parameters > > +SHOULD remain unchanged, for all VQs. > > Is the new added normative line without device is ok? > > Or should it be written as > ... In this case, the device SHOULD not update the parameters for all VQs. > > ? Your wording is confusing it can be intepreted to mean just that not all parameters change but some might. Generally we do not have to repeat "device" in each sentence. > > + > > > > The device MUST respond to the VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_VQ_SET > > command with VIRTIO_NET_ERR if it was not able to change the parameters. > > > > -- > > MST > For the functionality itself, ignoring above normative suggestion, > > Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]