[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio] [PATCH 2/5] feedback: drop use of "we"
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:10:23 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > explicitly say driver/device or use passive form > as appropriate. > > Cc: Arun Subbarao <asubbarao@lnxw.com> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> > --- > content.tex | 18 ++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > @@ -663,12 +664,12 @@ device), so we keep a counter of how many we've added: > \subsubsection{Updating The Index Field}\label{sec:General Initialization And Device Operation / Device Operation / Supplying Buffers to The Device / Updating The Index Field} > > Once the index field of the virtqueue is updated, the device will > -be able to access the descriptor chains we've created and the > +be able to access the descriptor chains that driver created and the s/driver/the driver/ ? (also in various places below) > memory they refer to. This is why a memory barrier is generally > used before the index update, to ensure it sees the most up-to-date > copy. > > -The index field always increments, and we let it wrap naturally at > +The index field always increments, and wraps naturally at > 65536: > > \begin{lstlisting}
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]