[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ccw: be more precise the semantic of revision 1
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 20:59:13 +0100 Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: s/precise/precise about/ > Revision 1 of the CCW transport is currently defined as virtio 1.0. This > could become confusing when we bump the version of the virtio > specification to 1.1, in a sense that it could be interpreted like one > can not use any features not part of the 1.0 specification. > > So let us try to avoid confusion regarding the semantic of virtio-ccw > revision 1. > > Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > content.tex | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex > index c7ef7fd..86044dd 100644 > --- a/content.tex > +++ b/content.tex > @@ -2572,7 +2572,7 @@ The following values are supported: > \hline \hline > 0 & 0 & <empty> & legacy interface; transitional devices only \\ > \hline > -1 & 0 & <empty> & Virtio 1.0 \\ > +1 & 0 & <empty> & Virtio 1 \\ > \hline > 2 & 0 & <empty> & CCW_CMD_READ_STATUS support \\ > \hline Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]