Re: [PATCH] Provide detailed specification of virtio-blk lifetime metrics

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 06:43:14AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 04:25:56PM +0000, Enrico Granata wrote:
> > In the course of review, some concerns were surfaced about the
> > original virtio-blk lifetime proposal, as it depends on the eMMC
> > spec which is not open
> > 
> > Add a more detailed description of the meaning of the fields
> > added by that proposal to the virtio-blk specification, as to
> > make it feasible to understand and implement the new lifetime
> > metrics feature without needing to refer to JEDEC's specification
> > 
> > This patch does not change the meaning of those fields nor add
> > any new fields, but it is intended to provide an open and more
> > clear description of the meaning associated with those fields.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Enrico Granata <egranata@google.com>
> 
> Still not a fan of the encoding, but at least it is properly documented
> now:
> 
> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

With that, would you like to ack the virtip-blk patch too?
The format didn't actually change ...

-- 
MST