Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH v2] virtio: Improve queue_reset polarity to match to default reset state

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 02:13:42PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > queue_reset removal has far more editorial changes.
> > Before I update the v4 to incorporate, please discuss/sync with Michael or others what is best course of action from spec timing perspective.
> >  I am ok either way to draft either by
> > (a) removal of queue_reset register and allow queue_disable by replacing RING_RESET definition in v4
> > Or
> > (b) fixing the polarity as done in v3
> 
> Ok.
> 
> Thanks

So Jason, what is your take? I am inclined to keep queue reset register
and just flip the polarity. Less spec work and semantics are more or
less clear. Not helpful for migration - limited to queue
resize, watchdog and similar uses - but if we are expanding
scope to migration that makes it imo not 1.2 material.

-- 
MST