[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] latexify document more.
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:45:05 +1030 Rusty Russell <rusty@au1.ibm.com> wrote: > Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> writes: > > On Mon, 02 Dec 2013 16:56:16 +1030 > > Rusty Russell <rusty@au1.ibm.com> wrote: > >> @@ -1970,11 +1984,11 @@ and align the alignment. > >> The virtqueue is physically contiguous, with padded added to make the > >> used ring meet the align value: > >> > >> -\begin{verbatim} > >> -+-------------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+ > >> -| Descriptor Table | Available Ring (padding) | Used Ring | > >> -+-------------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+ > >> -\end{verbatim} > >> +\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} > >> +\hline > >> +Descriptor Table & Available Ring (\ldots padding\ldots) & Used Ring \\ > >> +\hline > >> +\end{tabular} > >> > >> The calculation for total size is as follows: > >> > > > > Just noted: This seems to be a duplicate paragraph, no? We already > > described the layout earlier, no need to repeat it in the virtio-ccw > > section. > > Yes, we describe it once in the legacy section earlier. The > duplication is deliberate, so that each section stands alone, because > we were originally going to put legacy in a separate document. Even > if we don't, making non-legacy depend on legacy feels wrong; I think > this is the lesser evil? > > But I don't really mind. If you dislike it, please directly edit > before meeting :) On re-reading, I think I'll keep it in there.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]