[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio] Minutes for 2014-03-11 Oasis VIRTIO TC call
On 2014年3月11日 14:30 午後, Pawel Moll wrote: > VIRTIO-60 vring*, VRING_* and virtio_ring used for virtqueue without explanation > > Accepted, to be followed up in a new issue to clarify, proposed by > Rusty, seconded by Pawel, no objections > Regarding this issue, Holm (who raised the initial objection to Rusty's patch) was unable to attend the meeting and did not voice any objections to me about it in advance, but in our discussion afterwards has mentioned a few issues of concern that I have asked him to post to the comment list for follow-up. As this change introduces a fair bit of churn, perhaps we could instead defer this until those issues are addressed or rejected in order to avoid the potential for a messy revert later on? Obviously as this has already passed we can handle the revert scenario too for the third draft if it becomes necessary.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]