[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio] virtio 1.0 errata
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 21:12:03 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > ok we have a somewhat major issue with > incorrect ring size listed in the table: > VIRTIO-120 > > this seems to warrant errata release, > and we can fix the ugly ldots: VIRTIO-115 I agree that we want an errata release for these. > > anything else that's small and urgent enough that it can and should go > in errata? The (mostly cosmetic) section alignment for virtio-block (VIRTIO-125) I just posted is certainly small, but I don't think I'd classify it as urgent.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]