[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: format for errata?
I see. I have another question. When is it appropriate the advance 1.0 to e.g. 1.1? On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 07:11:54AM -0500, Chet Ensign wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Well, you can't really publish an errata yet. Virtio V1.0 is a Committee > Specification and errata can only be published for OASIS Standards. Rather, the > approach you need to take is to prepare a new working draft and treat it as a > new Committee Specification Draft. After public review, it is then approved by > the TC as Committee Specification 02. > > /chet > > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi Chet, > I started preparing errata for virtio 1.0. > > What's the proper format for latest version > and for citation format sections for errata > documents? > > Thanks, > > -- > MST > > > > > -- > > /chet [§] > ---------------- > Chet Ensign > Director of Standards Development and TC Administration > OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society > http://www.oasis-open.org > > Primary: +1 973-996-2298 > Mobile: +1 201-341-1393 > > Check your work using the Support Request Submission Checklist at http:// > www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/47248/ > tc-admin-submission-checklist.html > > TC Administration information and support is available at http:// > www.oasis-open.org/resources/tcadmin > > Follow OASIS on: > LinkedIn: http://linkd.in/OASISopen > Twitter: http://twitter.com/OASISopen > Facebook: http://facebook.com/oasis.open
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]