[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: BRSP meeting either this Thu 25, or Thu Oct 2 ?
All: We planned to have a meeting either this Thu 25, or Thu Oct 2, 11amPT. Let me know your conflicts if any. Agenda: - We have to dispose of the BSP comment we got from the last PR: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-brsp-comment/201409/msg00000.html (Note that this comment raises a point we have been discussing before. If we follow this comment, that also leads to some significant “material” change on the profile .) - Statements of use, for members who have implemented these profiles under WS-I (IBM, MSFT, Oracle, Asynchrony?). See below template statements (the <> have to be replaced, and the right conformance clause has to be selected.) - (note: I am trying to localize the WS-I similar statements that were made in the past) Thanks, -jacques ------------------ Statement of use templates: ----------------- for BP1.2: We, <company> have successfully used the Basic Profile v1.2 specified by the WS-BRSP TC in the Committee Specification 01: http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-brsp/BasicProfile/v1.2/cs01/BasicProfile-v1.2-cs01.pdf titled: "Basic Profile v1.2" dated and approved on June 16, 2014. Our service implementation (INSTANCE conformance target) complied with the <"Core" Conformance Clause (2.4.1)> < "HTTP transport" Conformance Clause (2.4.2)> and underwent interoperability testing with partners, using test assertions in Appendix D. ----------------- for BP2.0: We, <company> have successfully used the Basic Profile v2.0 specified by the WS-BRSP TC in the Committee Specification 01: http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-brsp/BasicProfile/v2.0/cs01/BasicProfile-v2.0-cs01.pdf titled: "Basic Profile v2.0" dated and approved on June 16, 2014. Our service implementation (INSTANCE conformance target) complied with the <"Core" Conformance Clause (2.4.1)> < "HTTP transport" Conformance Clause (2.4.2)> and underwent interoperability testing with partners, using test assertions in Appendix D. ----------------- for RSP1.0: We, <company> have successfully used the Reliable Secure Profile Version 1.0 specified by the WS-BRSP TC in the Committee Specification 01: http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-brsp/ReliableSecureProfile/v1.0/cs01/ReliableSecureProfile-v1.0-cs01.pdf titled: "Reliable Secure Profile Version 1.0" dated and approved on June 16, 2014. Our service implementation (INSTANCE conformance target) complied with the <"Core" Conformance Clause based on BP1.2 (2.4.1)> <"HTTP transport" Conformance Clause based on BP1.2 (2.4.2)> <"Core" Conformance Clause based on BP2.0 (2.4.3)> <"HTTP transport" Conformance Clause based on BP2.0 (2.4.4)> and underwent interoperability testing with partners, using test assertions in Appendix D. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]