RE: [ws-caf-editors] Action items from F2F

["Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>]

Which actions can we tick off as a result of the latest editors draft?
Also some seem related to bugzilla issues so can probably be marked as done.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Martin Chapman [mailto:martin.chapman@oracle.com] 
>Sent: 11 March 2005 16:41
>To: 'ws-caf editors'
>Subject: [ws-caf-editors] Action items from F2F
>
>
>
>Here's the list of action items from the F2F minutes that were 
>assigned over to the editors on the 28th feb meeting:
>
>Action: editors to add text on extensibility to WS-Context 
>(and WS-CF as well?). 
>
>Action: editors to adjust the text of section 4 for issue 220 
>http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=220 
>
>Action: editors to make wsdl operation style consistent 
>http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=223 
>
>Action: editors to take a first pass and enter the resulting 
>issues from Anish into Bugzilla. 
>
>ACTION: assigned to editorial to implement the suggestion 
>http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=162 
>
>Action: assigned to editorial to remove 
>http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=171 
>
>ACTION: assigned to editorial to clarify which operations 
>require a context and whether it is a full context or just a 
>context identifier. 
>http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=178 
>
>
>ACTION: editorial. change the text so that the rules regarding 
>the raising of the wrongState fault is the responsibility of 
>the referencing specification. 
>http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=184 
>
>ACTION: assigned to editorial – need to cleanup documentation 
>http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=186 
>
>ACTION: assigned to editorial – keep the same style for 
>operational description. 
>http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=187 
>
>ACTION: assigned to editorial to check that the terminology is 
>consistent. 
>http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=191 
>
>ACTION: assign to editorial – draft text expanding/clarifying 
>the relationship with WS-Context. 
>http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=201 
>
>ACTION: editors, add architectural diagrams 
>http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=215 
>
>ACTION: editors, Add tables giving message parameters and types 
>http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=216 
>
>ACTION: editors to come up with a concrete template for each 
>WSDL and then apply. 
>http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=217 
>
>Action: editors, make a proposal to Define the syntax and 
>semantics of transient faults and which operations need them 
>http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=199 
>
>
>ACTION: Editors to create WSDL and schema consistent with next 
>draft (both context and cf.) due 11 March. 
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Martin Chapman                                 
>Consulting Member of Technical Staff           
>Oracle                                        
>P: +353 87 687 6654                           
>e: martin.chapman@oracle.com                   
>
>