[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-caf-implement] Implementation tasks
Tully, Gary wrote: > Sorry about the delay in responding. No problem. > This sounds reasonable and achievable. Good, glad someone else thinks so :-) > I would suggest that this remains an optional part of the demo > as it is an optional part of the specification. > The key element of the demo is interoperability not completeness. I understand that it is an optional part of the specification but, personally, I would still like to see it included if we have the time to do so. If nobody else agrees then I am willing to leave it out of the demo. > I Agree. There is currently an action on the implementation team to propose a protocol to demonstrate WS-CF. I am hoping to have something for comment out by Thursday as I am away next week. Do you have any ideas? Thanks, Kev -- Kevin Conner Arjuna Technologies Ltd.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]