Re: [ws-caf] Re: Speedy resolutions

["Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>]

Alastair, attached is just one of the emails that Kavi sent when I first
created the ballots. It was sent (and received by me) on the 6th of
February, as Martin said (Monday and not Friday). Are you saying you didn't
receive them until the 9th? Some new ballots have been set up yesterday, but
these obviously have different deadlines.

If you didn't receive the first set of ballots on the 6th then we should
obviously be talking to OASIS staff who can probably better track when
emails were sent and to whom.

Mark.

----
Mark Little,
Chief Architect, Transactions,
Arjuna Technologies Ltd.

www.arjuna.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Green, Alastair J." <Alastair.Green@choreology.com>
To: "Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>;
<ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 8:26 AM
Subject: RE: [ws-caf] Re: Speedy resolutions


> Martin,
>
> What does "create an issue" mean? The vote is called when it's called.
>
> I received a series of e-mails on Monday at 16.00 GMT notifying me of
> these ballots. Monday is not Friday. Friday minus Monday is four or five
> days depending on your interpretation. It isn't seven. I don't think
> this is the correct procedure.
>
> Alastair
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Chapman [mailto:martin.chapman@oracle.com]
> Sent: 10 February 2004 13:11
> To: ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [ws-caf] Re: Speedy resolutions
>
> the issues were created on Friday 6th and I extended them all to Friday
> 13
> (midnight est) to meet the minimum requirement. The rationale for this
> was
> so that we can have the results for the meeting next Monday.
>
> Martin.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mark Little [mailto:mark.little@arjuna.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 11:33 AM
> > To: Green, Alastair J.; ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: [ws-caf] Re: Speedy resolutions
> >
> >
> > The minimum time is apparently 7 days. Martin changes the
> > duration of the issues I created (unaware of the minimum) yesterday.
> >
> > Mark.
> >
> > ----
> > Mark Little,
> > Chief Architect, Transactions,
> > Arjuna Technologies Ltd.
> >
> > www.arjuna.com
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Green, Alastair J." <Alastair.Green@choreology.com>
> > To: <mark.little@arjuna.com>; <ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 11:22 AM
> > Subject: Speedy resolutions
> >
> >
> > > Hi Mark,
> > >
> > > Is there a decided TC policy on the duration of TC ballots?
> > >
> > > I think that allowing only five days (Monday to Friday) for
> > votes is a
> > > bit
> > short. In BTP we allowed a week, which allows people for whom
> > CAF is not a day job a chance to do some weekend catch up.
> > >
> > > Alastair
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: mark.little@arjuna.com [mailto:mark.little@arjuna.com]
> > > Sent: 09 February 2004 10:47
> > > To: ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org
> > > Subject: [ws-caf] Groups -
> > > http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15 (formerly
> > > services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi) modified
> > >
> > >
> > > Information about the document
> > http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15 (formerly
> > services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi) has been
> > modified by Mark Little (mark.little@arjuna.com).
> > >
> > > Document Description:
> > > This document is a link to
> > http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15http
> ://services.ar
> juna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15
> >
> >
> > Download Document:
> >
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-caf/download.php/5342/se
> rvic
> es.arjuna.comwscaf-issuesshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D15
> >
> > View Document Details:
> >
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-caf/document.php?documen
> t_id
> =5342
> >
> > Referenced Items
> > Date            Name                             Type
> > ----            ----                             ----
> > 10 Feb 2004      Proposed resolution for iss...  Ballot
> >
> > PLEASE NOTE:  If the above links do not work for you, your email
> application
> > may be breaking the link into two pieces.  You may be able to copy and
> paste
> > the entire link address into the address field of your web browser.
> >
> > -OASIS Open Administration
> >
> >
>
>
>

--- Begin Message ---

• From: workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org
• To: mark.little@arjuna.com
• Date: 6 Feb 2004 10:31:00 -0000

OASIS Web Services Composite Application Framework TC member,

A new ballot has been presented to OASIS Web Services Composite Application Framework TC.  To vote on this ballot, go here:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-caf/ballot.php?id=347

Please DO NOT REPLY to this email; instead, vote using the above link.

The text of this ballot is as follows:
---
"Proposed resolution for issue 12"
The text for issue 12 says:

"sender address is misleading – should be reply-to address since the intention 
is to allow flexibility in where a response can be sent."

Propose changing the name in the schema to reply-to and ensuring that this is used consistently in the specification(s).

- Yes
- No

Referenced Items
Date            Name                             Type
----            ----                             ----
06 Feb 2004     services.arjuna.com/wscaf-i...   Reference Document

---

The ballot closes Tuesday, 10 February 2004 @ 5:00 am ET.  Please vote before then by visiting:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-caf/ballot.php?id=347

Thank you,
OASIS Open Administration

--- End Message ---