Re: [ws-caf] [Bug 130] New: SOAP mustUnderstand should not be determined by ws-context

["Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>]

Done.

Mark.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com>
To: <ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 1:10 PM
Subject: RE: [ws-caf] [Bug 130] New: SOAP mustUnderstand should not be
determined by ws-context


>
> Sorry, I must have clicked the commit button twice. 130 should be closed
> immediately as duplicate of 129,
>
> Peter
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: bugzilla-daemon@arjuna.com [mailto:bugzilla-daemon@arjuna.com]
> > Sent: 26 May 2004 12:31
> > To: ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: [ws-caf] [Bug 130] New: SOAP mustUnderstand should
> > not be determined by ws-context
> >
> >
> > http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=130
> >
> >            Summary: SOAP mustUnderstand should not be
> > determined by ws-
> >                     context
> >            Product: WS-Context
> >            Version: 1.0
> >           Platform: PC
> >         OS/Version: Windows 2000
> >             Status: NEW
> >           Severity: normal
> >           Priority: P2
> >          Component: Implementation and interoperability
> >         AssignedTo: ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org
> >         ReportedBy: peter.furniss@choreology.com
> >          QAContact: mark.little@arjuna.com
> >
> >
> > Draft 0.2, section 2.1 says that SOAP:mustUnderstand must be
> > true for a context
> > sent with an application message.  WS-Context should not
> > specify this - it
> > should be left to a higher level. There will certainly be
> > some cases where a
> > context is propagated in hope, but not certainty, that it
> > will be recognised. A
> > referencing specification could mandate a value, or leave it
> > to the particular
> > use.
> >
> > It should be stated that SOAP:mustUnderstand=1 on a
> > ws-context means the
> > receiver is required to understand the particular
> > context-type, not just that
> > it is a ws-context.
> >
> >
> >
> > ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> > You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
> >
>