RE: [ws-caf] Questions about section 3

["Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>]

Mark: 

> As to what happens if you get an unsolicited message (e.g., a 
> contentsSet when no setContents was sent), then that's pretty 
> much the same: it can happen now, with A. N. Other 
> specification. I suppose we could put something in saying 
> that such unsolicited responses are to be ignored, but is 
> there a standard disclaimer that others use?

This raises an interesting point. Would it be possible for the editors
to provide (psuedo) state machines that normatively cover this type of
scenario? They exist in WS-AT/BA and as I recall Peter did some tables
for the BTP effort along these lines.

Jim
--
http://jim.webber.name