RE: [ws-caf] propsed text for issue 133

["Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>]

Mark:

> I'd say that your presumption is correct. At least that's 
> what I mean when using it (it's a shorthand). Where do you 
> think this is contradicted?

It was the general use of language. I was starting to think there was
some kind of REST-ish implication that the context is a Web resource
that can be accessed via a GET on a URI. 

Is there a message exchange defined for requesting a context document
for this scenario?

Jim
--
http://jim.webber.name