[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-caf] WS-Context potential bug - no explicit conformance statements
Dear
Mark,
OK and
thanks for the information.
I
would hope that the Chairs and editors (and whole TC if required) will support
the inclusion of some specific text on conformance so that those who read the
spec after us are clear on the various aspects of conformance - I surprised
myself by how much I dug out, I must admit! I am certainly not claiming it
is all correct and word perfect, by the way. I hope people will be able to
comment and help get it right as it is added. But I tried to provide
what might be fairly complete text to make this process as speedy as
possible.
Best
Regards Tony
A M Fletcher
Cohesions (TM)
Business transaction management software for
application coordination www.choreology.com
Choreology Ltd., 68 Lombard Street, London
EC3V 9LJ UK
Tel: +44 (0) 1473 729537 Fax: +44 (0) 870 7390077 Mobile: +44 (0) 7801
948219
tony.fletcher@choreology.com
(Home: amfletcher@iee.org) -----Original Message-----
From: Mark Little [mailto:mark.little@arjuna.com] Sent: 24 August 2004 14:48 To: Tony Fletcher; ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org Cc: martin.chapman@oracle.com; 'Newcomer, Eric (Iona)' Subject: Re: [ws-caf] WS-Context potential bug - no explicit conformance statements It
was closed earlier this month. I believe the following text was
added:
"One
or more other specifications, such as (but not limited to) WS-CF may reference
the WS-Context specification. The usage of the optional items in WS-Context is
typically determined by the requirements of such as referencing
specification."
but
there was discussion (on the editor's mailing list and telecons) where it was
thought that the specification already made clear that conformance issues there
are. Your text goes a little further than we (the editors) thought necessary: a
conformant implementation MUST support all mandatory items and MAY support any
optional items.
However,
a cursory glance at your text looks like a useful
addition.
Mark.
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]