[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-caf] security considerations
This proposed addition (if you mean to the schema) will itself run into some XML Schema constraints: The addition of any particular attribute in a ##other namespace (such as wsu:id) will make the schema invalid according to the Unique Particle Attribution (§3.8.6)[1] constraint. This is described in detail in Appendix H of XML Schema part 1[2]. The Attribute Wildcard Intersection description[3] adds some support for this position. Text describing use of this attribute in the specification would, of course, avoid such problems. thanx, doug [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-1-20010502/#cos-nonambig [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-1-20010502/#non-ambig [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-1-20010502/#cos-aw-intersect On 10-Sep-04 11:47, Greg Pavlik wrote: > yes, this is a proposed addition. > > Doug Bunting wrote: > >> Greg, >> >> A minor point... >> >> On 10-Sep-04 09:40, Greg Pavlik wrote: >> >>> The ContextType schema includes an optional attribute, wsu:Id, which is >> >> >> >> Actually, the schema does not explicitly mention any attribute in >> another namespace. In other words, the text may describe this >> particular option but the schema does not. I suggest "The ContextType >> schema allows use of an optional..." with a similar change for the >> context-identifier mention later in the same paragraph. >> >> thanx, >> doug >> > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]