[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [Bug 163] New: WS-CF without Coordinator and Participant
http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=163 Summary: WS-CF without Coordinator and Participant Product: WS-CF Version: 1.0 Platform: PC URL: http://www.choreology.com/external/ws- cf.choreology_comments.htm#CHCF-5 OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Text and diagrams AssignedTo: ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org ReportedBy: tony.fletcher@choreology.com QAContact: mark.little@arjuna.com Where: 2, page 9, para 4 With the removal of ALS from WS-Context, the middle sentence of this says that a compliant WS-CF implementation doesn’t have to do anything. This seems a little wide. Presumably the intent is to cover coordination protocols whose propagated context is derived from wsctx:context. Is it meaningful in any case to claim to be using WS-CF when it is only acting as a context service - and for a non-interoperable (or at least non-ws) coordination capability? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]