[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-caf] AssertionType
Tony, if you really want to know what it was for I'm sure I can dig it out of the archives. However, I think the URI is not required any longer. If it is for a specific implementation or a referencing specification, then it can always be added as part of the Any in the basic AssertionType. All the best, Mark. ---- Mark Little, Chief Architect, Arjuna Technologies Ltd. www.arjuna.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Fletcher" <tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com> To: "'WS-CAF'" <ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 11:07 PM Subject: RE: [ws-caf] AssertionType > Dear John and others, > > As I said on the phone, as far as I can see at present, > AssertionWithProtocolURIType only adds a protocol-uri element which is of > anyURI type. Again the purpose and use of this parameter is not described > in the WS-Context specification, so the first obvious thought is to drop it > too. If this parameter is really required it can be added to each protocol > message (which would now not be an extension of anything) as easily as each > protocol message extending this base type. In this case the purpose and use > of this parameter should be clearly described in the WS-Context > specification. > > > Best Regards Tony > A M Fletcher > > Cohesions (TM) > > Business transaction management software for application coordination > www.choreology.com > > Choreology Ltd., 68 Lombard Street, London EC3V 9LJ UK > Tel: +44 (0) 1473 729537 Mobile: +44 (0) 7801 948219 > tony.fletcher@choreology.com (Home: amfletcher@iee.org) > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Fuller [mailto:jfuller@wernervas.com] > Sent: 17 January 2005 21:12 > To: WS-CAF > Subject: [ws-caf] AssertionType > > > > If we get rid of AssertionType, what happens to > AssertionWithProtocolURIType? > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]