[Bug 224] Mandate WSDL and SOAP?

[bugzilla-daemon@arjuna.com]

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=224

mark.little@arjuna.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |LATER



------- Additional Comments From mark.little@arjuna.com  2005-02-17 11:18 -------
Related to conformance.  Mark motioned to say that if an implementation supports
context / one ways then it must do according to the specification.  Kevin
seconded (i.e. optional to implement, but specification is normative if you do
implement).  Amendment from Doug: a conformant implementation must implement one
ways according to the specification.  Tony suggested putting conformance for the
CAF stack in the highest level referencing specification in the CAF family. 
Eric said no as will not always have a referencing specification.

Greg: there are different conformance points in the specification. For instance
may just comply with the context structure only, or with the structure and by
the reference mechanism.  Greg suggested a functional unit approach.  Martin
agreed with Tony that high-level specifications can/should add conformance
statements for what they used, but also felt each should be usable stand-alone
as Eric said.  Doug suggested having a consistent statement on WSDL in all the
CAF specifications.

Tony said that he supported what Greg said as well as what he had expressed.

Motion: if you use the facility then must do according to WSDL and text in the
specification. 
Agreed unanimously.

It was agreed that people can and should review the resulting text in WS-Context
and raise new specific issues if necessary.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.